Remember that song? I know it, too......someone once asked me if I knew every song every written, and I replied "no, but I'm working on it....."
The saddle - or should that be the horse? - is my Canadian quilt, which now needs borders.
A narrow black border (already cut), then a slightly wider white border (not yet cut), and the outer border in this gorgeous batik fabric. The Cunning Plan is to hopefully start on it this week.Two more houses, cats roaming around the rooftop at night, and a cheerful house with one of my favourite prints around it.
Just five more houses to go.
Just five more houses to go.
On Tuesday it will be my turn to take along morning tea to quilt group (which will be something seasonal from a shop, it's fruit mince pie season after all) and a block of the month for anyone who wishes to make it. I have been toying for a while with the idea of simple blocks in a limited colour scheme, and came up with just blue and green.
The blocks fit together like a jigsaw; the small ones are six inches square finished, while the long ones are six by twelve inches when finished and are easily made from 2-1/2 inch strips.
What do you reckon? I think it could be fun; I enjoyed making the first three, so made a few more. The people who whinge at the merest slightest thought of even the hint of a triangle should be happy too.
The blocks fit together like a jigsaw; the small ones are six inches square finished, while the long ones are six by twelve inches when finished and are easily made from 2-1/2 inch strips.
What do you reckon? I think it could be fun; I enjoyed making the first three, so made a few more. The people who whinge at the merest slightest thought of even the hint of a triangle should be happy too.
Don't laugh. You haven't heard them complain.......
Another night out on Thursday night for the choir end of year dinner, at the same restaurant I ate at last weekend. Once again, a delicious meal I enjoyed because I didn't have to think about it; it was just put in front of me and I ate it.
We are being assailed on all sides now every time we turn on the TV with large happy families celebrating Christmas together, from the cheerful smiling (always youthful, of course) grandparents to the cute never messy toddlers and babies, and everyone is genetically blessed and oh-so-photogenic. That's all well and good......but what about smaller families or people who don't have anyone they wish to celebrate with? Why can't we see more diversity at this time of year? Not everyone who spends the day alone is unhappy to be doing so, you know. These days not so many in this country keep Christmas as a religious occasion any more; people who have come here from other countries have their own special celebration times too, but that message doesn't seem to have gotten through to the people who make TV ads.
We have booked into a restaurant for dinner on Christmas night, something we started doing when both our sons were overseas and it was just the two of us. It makes the day a bit more special than just sitting around at home and grinning at each other, doesn't it?
Besides which, it's one more meal I won't have to cook......
Because the ukulele group has been meeting here on Mondays there might just be a few Chrissy decorations strewn about. Only two more Mondays and we will have a break until next year, with a market gig lined up for January.
"Introductions at a ball.
Gentlemen who are introduced to ladies at a ball, solely for the purpose of dancing, wait to be recognized before speaking with ladies upon meeting afterwards, but they are at liberty to recall themselves by lifting their hats in passing. Here as in England a ball-room acquaintance rarely goes any further, until they have met at more balls than one; also, a gentleman cannot after being introduced to a young lady, ask her for more than two dances during the same evening. Here, as in England, an introduction given for dancing purposes does not constitute acquaintanceship."
This being a long paragraph it will, as they say, be continued in our next. The "here" mentioned in the quote might be America or it might be Australia, as the book was first published in America in 1885 then revised and published in Melbourne, Australia, in 1886. My copy is a facsimile reprint, an exact copy, published in 1980 and was bought at a library surplus sale in the Big Smoke many years ago.....how could I leave such a treasure?

Enjoy your days!
