Woe is me, shame and scandal in the family......

Anyone else remember that old song?  It was around when I was a Sweet Young Thing, and never failed to raise a chuckle.  I was reminded of it earlier in the week while watching one of those genealogical programs, which - even if we don't know of the person concerned - are usually interesting.  

My maternal grandmother Edith married twice, we grew up knowing that our mother and uncle had a much older step-sister.  Given that it was the early 1920s we always assumed - even my mother assumed - that Edith's first husband Albert had died, but no.  Edith took their daughter and left, and Albert sued for divorce on the grounds of desertion.  The decree nisi was granted in March 1923; I have a copy of the court proceedings (and very interesting reading it is too) which states bluntly "If you marry again before this decree is absolute you will be committing bigamy".  The decree absolute period was five years, probably standard for the time, which would mean that Edith and Albert were free to marry again in 1928.  Albert remarried in 1930 but - Edith and my grandfather Frank were married in September 1923, possibly because my mother was on the way.  I have long wondered if it was really a legal marriage so recently joined a social media genealogy group and asked the question.  The general opinion was, no, it was a bigamous marriage.  That would have made my mother and her brother illegitimate, something which would have cause great mortification and embarrassment to my mother had she known.  Finding out in her 60s that she was born just six months after her parents' marriage was bad enough for her.

It was nigh on 100 years ago and these days it doesn't matter, but it's still interesting to know, isn't it?  These are my grandparents Edith and Frank - Francis David - with my mother Mavis in 1924.  It's behind glass, hence the flash.

It's time for the annual wattle pic!  Our wattle is starting to bloom, we love its glorious golden gorgeousness.

Some shopping was done and a suitable top purchased for next week's gig, bought new on sale ($55 reduced to $20, not bad eh?) to be worn under this jacket.  The appliqué reminds me of the lotus design on my Singer treadle machines, both from the mid-1920s, which is very apt as the evening has a 'Roaring Twenties' theme.

This was bought a very long time ago at a quilt show in Canberra, the flowers are cut from a stripe while the foliage is an irridescent olive green, and the machine appliqué is exquisitely done.  The lining is a very deep dark olive green, the main fabric a black cotton blend.  It was a little pricey but I liked it, it was different and unique, beautifully made.....and twenty years later I still wear it, so it was money well spent.  Some sparkly jewellery, a flower for my hair, and I will be good to go.  

The quilting between the white and outer leafy print border on my Canadian quilt has been completed, now I am waiting for a decent block of time to free motion quilt the outer border.  Later in the week is looking hopeful, fingers crossed......diamonds have been pieced, more diamonds have been cut.  Stitches have been knitted, words have been read.  Shopping has been shopped.  Food has been cooked.  General running around has been run.  All the things that make the daily grind exciting, in other words, have been done.

Continuing on with General Rules for Balls:

"Though not customary for a married couple to dance together in society, those men who wish to show their wives the compliment of such unusual attention, if they possess any independence, will not be deterred from doing so by their fear of any comments from Mrs. Grundy."

'Mrs Grundy' was not a real person, but concern about offending her seems to have been strong in past times.  Many years ago Reg Grundy was a TV entrepeneur, and his name is now used as an Aussie rhyming term for underwear.....'Reg Grundies' for 'undies'.  I don't know what Mrs Grundy would have thought about that.

Enjoy your days!